Reading suggestion #17: Case C-617/10 Åklagaren v Fransson

In case C-617/10 Fransson, the matter of the application of the Charter to national measures came to the forefront once more. The Swedish referring court asked the European Court of Justice whether the principle of ne bis in idem (a general principle of EU law, but in any case one codified in the Charter, see Art. 50) could apply and be used to set aside certain domestic provisions. Under these norms, when a taxpayer provides false information to the authorities for the purpose of tax assessment, not only might she incur a tax surcharge, but she could also face criminal prosecution for the same misconduct. The claimant in the main proceedings argued that this scheme of penalties amounted to a violation of the principle of ne bis in idem, contained in the EU Charter (Art. 50) and the ECHR (Art. 4 of Protocol No 7), and requested the judge to set aside the Swedish provisions.

See Filippo Fontanelli’s comment to the judgement on Diritti Comparati.

Advertisements

About eulaworebro

Örebro Universitet (Sweden)
This entry was posted in Case-law, Reading suggestions and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s